Table Saw
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Equipment Information | |
---|---|
Status | Working |
Manufacturer | Rojek |
Model | PK 315 |
Hackspace Information | |
Induction Required | No |
Card RFID Enabled | No |
Owner | Leeds Hackspace |
Due to the hazards of the table saw this tool usage is by induction only. Please speak to one of the inductors to arrange .
Before using using the Table saw be a star
STOP
Don't jump stright in
THINK
Is the table saw the right tool, is there a better safer tool in the space such as miter saw?
What the safest way of carryout what you want to achieve?
What PPE do you need, push sticks ect?
ACT
Carry out the work
REVIWE
What worked well?
Is there anything I could have done better?
Could I have worked safer?
A big noisy table saw which will make short work of large lumps of wood and finger ends
- 4kw
- 2800rpm
- 0-45 degree tilt
- 100mm max depth of cut
- 315mm max blade
- Spindle diameter 30 mm
Risk assessment for use of Table Saw.
Hazards.
- 1) Loss of fingers.
- 2) Loss of limb.
- 3) Exposure to high acoustic levels.
- 4) Inhalation of wood dust.
- 5) Hair or clothing entangled in blade.
- 6) Blade kick back causing projectile injury.
- 7) Damage to eyes from particles.
- 8) Injury from falling onto blade
Persons at risk.
- Operator.
- Persons nearby.
Initial assessment of risk.
Hazard identified | Severity | Probability | Risk Factor |
Loss of fingers. | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Loss of limb | 4 | 2 | 8 |
Exposure to high acoustic levels | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Inhalation of wood dust | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Hair or clothing entangled in blade | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Blade kick back causing projectile injury | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Damage to eyes from particles | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Injury from falling onto blade | 4 | 3 | 12 |
Control measures.
- Users will be required to attend induction training to learn how to use the machine safely.
- Safety glasses will be worn.
- Blade guard will be used.
- Keep hands away from the saw blade.
- Wear ear defenders.
- Tie back long hair back and secure loose clothing. Ties or scarves must not be worn.
- Wear a dust mask.
Final assessment of risk
Hazard identified | Severity | Probability | Risk Factor |
Loss of fingers. | 3 | 1 | 9 |
Loss of limb | 4 | 1 | 8 |
Exposure to high acoustic levels | 2 | 2 | 8 |
Inhalation of wood dust | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Hair or clothing entangled in blade | 3 | 1 | 9 |
Blade kick back causing projectile injury | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Damage to eyes from particles | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Injury from falling onto blade | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Points system
Hazard severity | Points Rating | Definition |
Nil | 1 | Very minor injury, bruise, graze, no risk of disease. |
Slight | 2 | Minor injury, which would allow the individual to continue work after first aid treatment on site or at a local surgery. The duration of the stoppage or treatment is such that the normal flow of work is not seriously interrupted. |
Moderate | 3 | Temporary disability causing injury or disease capable of keeping an individual off work for three days or more and reportable under RIDDOR |
High | 4 | Causing death, serious injury or permanent disability to an individual. |
Very high | 5 | Causing multiple deaths and widespread destruction eg. fire, building collapse. |
Hazard likelihood | Points Rating | Definition |
Remote possibility | 1 | There is really no risk present. Only under freak conditions could there be any possibility of an accident or illness. All reasonable precautions have been taken - This should be the normal state of the workplace. |
Unlikely | 2 | This incident or illness might occur but the probability is low and the risk minimal. |
Possible | 3 | The accident may occur if additional factors precipitate it, but it is unlikely to happen without them. |
Highly likely | 4 | Will happen more often than not. Additional factors could precipitate an incident but it is still likely to happen without this additional factor. |
Inevitable | 5 | If the work continues as it is, there is almost 100% certainty that an accident will happen, for example:
A broken stair or broken rung on a ladder Bare, exposed electrical conductors Unstable stacks of heavy boxes |
Risk Rating Score | Definition | Action |
1 to 4 | Low | No action required |
5 to 9 | Moderate | Reduce risks if reasonably practicable |
10 to 15 | High Risk | Priority action to be undertaken |
16 to 25 | Unacceptable | Action must be taken IMMEDIATELY |